<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking down social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontporchforum.com/blog/2009/12/16/breaking-down-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontporchforum.com/blog/2009/12/16/breaking-down-social-media/</link>
	<description>... about community within neighborhoods and Front Porch Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:58:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://frontporchforum.com/blog/2009/12/16/breaking-down-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-809904</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontporchforum.com/blog/?p=1064#comment-809904</guid>
		<description>The post is actually a good one, I commented there, saw you did too. I agree that the place FPF wants to be is in the lower right. I think it would be a good start if FPF could get there, but the channel is getting in the way:

Dan&#039;s article focuses pretty strongly (exclusively) on the channel used: &quot;Is the tool&#039;s functionality geared toward private conversations or group discussions? Is content sharing ego-driven, or is there a focus on discussion? For me, if the system is primarily designed for one-to-one or one-to-many communications, then it is individual focused.&quot; - Email is right there in the lower left, and I agree with his observation.

Imagine everything FPF is, with pictures (of the bike for sale, the family, the house), Kids ages, sports enjoyed, specialties (knitting, painting, gardening) with more permanence. I am not talking about posting a daily status, or even a Tweet - I am talking about really knowing your neighbor with the tools available - email was a great start - but it could be so much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post is actually a good one, I commented there, saw you did too. I agree that the place FPF wants to be is in the lower right. I think it would be a good start if FPF could get there, but the channel is getting in the way:</p>
<p>Dan&#8217;s article focuses pretty strongly (exclusively) on the channel used: &#8220;Is the tool&#8217;s functionality geared toward private conversations or group discussions? Is content sharing ego-driven, or is there a focus on discussion? For me, if the system is primarily designed for one-to-one or one-to-many communications, then it is individual focused.&#8221; &#8211; Email is right there in the lower left, and I agree with his observation.</p>
<p>Imagine everything FPF is, with pictures (of the bike for sale, the family, the house), Kids ages, sports enjoyed, specialties (knitting, painting, gardening) with more permanence. I am not talking about posting a daily status, or even a Tweet &#8211; I am talking about really knowing your neighbor with the tools available &#8211; email was a great start &#8211; but it could be so much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
